Contents in this Article
1.Why OBE Is No Longer Optional
A well-known engineering college once spent months preparing SAR documents.
Every CO was mapped. Every PO was ticked. The files looked perfect.
But when the NBA team visited, the assessment didn’t last long.
The question was simple: "Show us how your students apply what they learn."
The answer?
Silence.
What followed was a polite, but brutal rejection.
This isn’t just one story.
It’s the story of many campuses across the country.
Campuses that believed compliance was enough.
That paperwork would cover for lack of preparation.
But with the Revised NBA SAR 2025, that illusion has slowly diminishing.
OBE is no longer a side topic.
It is now the backbone of accreditation.
From COs to POs, from SDGs to WKs—Every part of SAR 2025 is rooted in Outcome-Based Education.
If you’ve followed this guide from the start—
Part 1 explained how NBA has shifted its vision
Part 2 showed you the key changes in SAR
Part 3 warned you that curriculum redesign is essential
Part 4 helped you cross the Pre-Qualifier line
Now comes the most important part:
How do you actually implement OBE the right way?
In this part, we’ll show you:
✔ What OBE really means (not just the buzzwords)
✔ How to build the right framework
✔ What tools and processes NBA now expects
✔ And why, when OBE is done right, NBA accreditation becomes the by-product—not the goal.
Let’s begin.
2. What Is Outcome-Based Education (OBE)?
Let’s keep it simple.
OBE is not a form.
Not a table.
Not an Excel sheet.
OBE is a mindset. It starts with one powerful question:
“What should our students be able to do when they graduate?”
“What should our students be able to do when they graduate?”
Once you answer that, everything else must fall in line.
Your curriculum.
Your teaching.
Your labs.
Your assessments.
Your feedback system.
But Most Colleges Still Get It Wrong.
They jump straight into CO-PO mapping.
They design question papers before defining real outcomes.
They confuse “marks” with “learning.”
This is why I wrote my book: “Outcome-Based Education – A Practical Guide for Higher Education Teachers” To break the myths and help institutions build a real OBE culture.
I’ve seen campuses that followed just the book’s first 3 chapters—They not only improved SAR performance but also transformed faculty thinking.
So, What Does OBE Actually Mean?
Here’s the simplest breakdown:
You define what the student should learn (COs)
You align it with what the program promises (POs, PSOs)
You teach in a way that leads to that learning (teaching strategy)
You assess it honestly (assessment methods)
You track how well the learning happened (attainment)
And finally, you improve what didn’t work (continuous improvement)
That’s it.
Simple in words.
Tough in practice.
NBA’s Revised SAR 2025 doesn’t want to see how well you’ve filled forms.
It wants to know how well your students have grown—Not just in marks, but in skills, in thinking, in contribution.
And this is where OBE becomes the bridge.
A bridge between what you teach and what the world actually needs.
Want to go deeper into CO design, Bloom’s taxonomy, CO-PO mapping techniques, rubric-based assessments, indirect tools, and continuous improvement cycles?
It’s all there—step-by-step—in my book.
But more on that later.
Right now, let’s see why OBE is the central pillar of the Revised NBA SAR 2025.
3. Why OBE Is the Backbone of SAR 2025
NBA has stopped whispering.
Now it’s saying it loud and clear.
If you haven’t implemented Outcome-Based Education, you don’t deserve accreditation.
That’s not an opinion.
It’s the core spirit of the Revised NBA SAR 2025.
In the older system, you could score well with some effort, a lot of paperwork, and a good SAR consultant.
Now, you need more than documents.
You need evidence of outcomes.
Every criterion in the new SAR is built around one invisible question:
“What change has your student gone through by learning from you?”
Let’s connect the dots:
POs are now aligned with WKs (Knowledge & Attitude Profiles)
Curriculum must reflect outcomes, not just topics
CO-PO Mapping must be logical and outcome-focused
Assessments must show whether learning has really happened
Improvement loops must exist where learning hasn’t happened
This is not a checklist. It’s a philosophy of education. And it’s the same philosophy I’ve detailed in my book: "Outcome-Based Education – A Practical Guide for Higher Education Teachers."
In fact, this book is more relevant now than ever before.
Because everything NBA expects in 2025, has already been explained in your language, with your campus challenges in mind.
Most institutions still think OBE is a “criterion.”
It’s not.
It’s the framework that every criterion is measured through.
That’s why if your faculty doesn’t understand OBE, your SAR won’t stand.
That’s why if your assessments aren’t aligned to COs, your reports will fall flat.
That’s why if your curriculum doesn’t reflect outcomes, NBA won’t even ask for your files.
Revised SAR 2025 is not asking for more documents.
It’s asking for proof that you’ve embraced OBE as a way of life.
The question is—has your campus truly made that shift?
4. Core Components of OBE That Must Be in Place
You can’t build an outcome-based system by decorating your SAR.
You build it by laying the foundation.
NBA SAR 2025 doesn’t ask for your theory.
It asks for your process.
The backbone.
The muscle.
The system that breathes OBE on your campus.
If these aren’t in place, your SAR may look ready—but your assessment team will know otherwise.
Here's what your campus must build—block by block:
1. Vision & Mission that Inspire Outcomes
Your vision isn’t a poster.
It’s the north star for your program.
Every outcome must reflect this direction.
👉 This is where your Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) begin.
2. Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)
PEOs describe what your graduates will become in 4–5 years.
Think long-term.
Job roles.
Career paths.
Higher studies.
Your curriculum must be mapped back to these.
But here’s what I see too often—
“Graduates will become socially responsible citizens…”
“Graduates will learn lifelong learning…”
Nice words.
But what do they mean in reality?
What roles?
What proof?
What path?
Many PEOs I’ve read in SAR documents are frankly amusing.
They sound like motivational posters, not outcome statements.
And that’s dangerous—because it reflects how shallow the understanding is.
That’s why in my book, I’ve included the most practical and scientific way to frame PEOs.
You’ll find methods, logic trees, and even sample statements that your entire faculty team can co-develop together.
The goal is not just to impress NBA.
The goal is to set a direction for your graduates—and then build your entire curriculum around that.
3. Program Outcomes (POs) and Program-Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
POs are NBA-defined.
But how you interpret and map them changes everything.
PSOs define what’s special about your program.
They should not be copied from the internet.
They must come from your faculty’s reflection and your program’s focus.
In my book, I explain a powerful exercise to help faculty co-create PSOs.
4. Course Outcomes (COs)
Every course must have COs.
Every CO must be measurable.
And every CO must follow Bloom’s Taxonomy.
If your CO starts with “understand” or “know”—you’re doing it wrong.
Start with action verbs.
Design, analyse, compare, evaluate, develop.
5. CO–PO Mapping That Makes Sense
Every CO must contribute to at least one PO.
And every PO must be touched by multiple COs.
Mapping isn’t guesswork.
It’s alignment.
If CO3 maps to PO5, you should be able to explain why.
6. Attainment Tracking & Gap Analysis
Assessment isn’t about assigning marks.
It’s about measuring outcomes.
You must define:– Direct tools (like internal exams, assignments)– Indirect tools (like feedback, surveys, alumni insights)
Then measure attainment.
Then find the gap.
Then take an action.
This is what NBA calls the Continuous Improvement Loop.
And this is where most institutions fail.
7. Continuous Improvement Is Not Just a Heading
Every outcome that’s not attained must lead to:–
a meeting– a decision– a redesign– and a follow-up
This loop must be visible.
Documented.
Tracked.
And alive.
If These Systems Are Weak, Your NBA Score Will Be Too
You cannot fake OBE anymore.
The team that visits your campus will ask to see the system.
The logic.
The continuity.
And the growth.
Don’t build for the report.
Build for your students.
5. Common Myths & Mistakes in OBE Implementation
If there’s one thing I’ve learned from reviewing over 150 SARs—It’s this: Most colleges think they’ve implemented OBE.
But in reality, they’ve only decorated it.
Let’s break some myths that quietly destroy your accreditation chances.
Myth 1: “We Mapped COs to POs, So We're Done.”
Reality: Mapping is not understanding.
Most CO–PO tables are filled with guesses.
No logic. No justification. No evidence.
If your faculty can’t explain why CO3 maps to PO5,your mapping will collapse during the NBA visit.
Myth 2: “Attainment Is Just a Percentage.”
Reality: Numbers mean nothing without context. A 70% attainment doesn't explain what went wrong.
Or what was done after.
NBA wants to see the cycle—not just the score.
Did you close the loop?
Did you take an action?
Did that action work?
Myth 3: “Let’s Copy COs From Last Year’s File.”
Reality: Every course, every year, every teacher is different. Copy-pasting COs is academic fraud. It shows your faculty hasn’t reflected on what they’re teaching.
Good COs are born from what the teacher wants the student to be able to do—not what someone else wrote.
Myth 4: “We Conducted a Workshop Once—That’s Enough.”
Reality: OBE is not a one-day training. It’s a culture shift. It needs practice, feedback, correction, and reflection.
A single workshop won’t create institutional excellence.
But a focused academic plan will.
Myth 5: “More Evidence = Better Accreditation”
Reality: Quality beats quantity. NBA experts don’t need 500 pages of reports. They need clear, logical, outcome-linked documentation.
Throwing PDFs into folders won’t help you. Showing genuine growth in students will.
Final Word on Mistakes
The biggest mistake isn’t doing OBE wrong.
It’s thinking you’ve done it right when you haven’t.
6. How to Strengthen OBE in Line with Revised SAR 2025
Revised NBA SAR 2025 doesn’t want stories.
It wants systems.
And those systems must show results.
The question is no longer:
“Have you implemented OBE?”
The question is:
“Can you prove it works?”
Let’s break down how you can build that proof, step by step.
a. Align Curriculum with WKs – Not Just POs
Start by revisiting your syllabus.
For each course, ask: Which WK (Knowledge and Attitude Profile) does this cover?
Is it technical depth (WK3), or sustainability (WK5), or ethics (WK9)?
You’ll find a detailed WK-to-PO mapping method in the upcoming Part 6 of this series.
But for now—remember this: WKs give depth to your curriculum.
NBA assessors will look for this vertical alignment.
b. Redesign COs Using Bloom’s Taxonomy
COs should not be copied from textbooks.
They should be written using precise action verbs from Bloom’s Taxonomy.
This shows academic intent—and measurable progress.
For example:
Wrong: “Understand thermodynamics”
Right: “Analyze thermodynamic cycles using pressure-volume relationships”
c. Map COs to POs – With Justification
Don’t just use a 3, 2, 1 scale.
That’s the last step, not the first.
Start by asking: “What does this CO enable the student to do, and how does that fulfil a specific PO?”
NBA assessors may ask your faculty: “Why did you assign CO3 a ‘3’ with PO6?”
If your team stumbles—your SAR score drops.
d. Use Direct and Indirect Tools for Attainment
Direct Tools:– Internal exams– Assignments– Mini projects– Lab performance
Indirect Tools:– Student feedback– Course exit survey– Alumni reflections– Employer insights
Combine both.
And set clear attainment thresholds.
For example: If 70% of students score >60% in CO3, the CO is attained.
e. Build the Continuous Improvement Loop
This is where most colleges fail.
Here’s what NBA expects to see:
Gap Identified → Root Cause Found → Action Taken → Impact Measured
Let’s say CO5 wasn’t attained.
What did you do?
Change teaching strategy?
Revise internal question paper?
Conduct an extra remedial class?
And did the next batch improve?
This is where your SAR becomes alive.
f. Train Your Faculty. Sustain Your System.
You can’t build OBE with just one coordinator.
You need a team.
A culture.
That means:– Regular FDPs on OBE– Peer reviews of COs and mappings– Templates that simplify SAR documentation– Academic audits every semester
This isn’t a sprint.
It’s a system that must run—long after the SAR is submitted.
NBA SAR 2025 isn’t complicated.
It’s clearer than ever—but only if your systems are strong.
If you build OBE from the inside out, SAR becomes a reflection.
Not a headache.
7. Tools, Templates & Training: Resources Colleges Must Have
A good system runs on logic.
A great system runs on tools.
Revised NBA SAR 2025 doesn’t want you to improvise every semester.
It wants to see if your OBE system is repeatable, scalable, and stable.
And for that—you need the right set of academic tools.
Let’s walk through what your college must have in place.
a. OBE Handbook for Your Campus
This is your bible.
A single document that explains:
– Vision, Mission, PEOs, POs– Process of CO formation– CO–PO Mapping logic– Attainment criteria and rubrics– Feedback collection– Continuous improvement– SAR evidence structure
This one document helps new faculty, NBA experts, and internal reviewers stay on the same page.
b. Course File Templates (Standardized for All Subjects)
Each faculty must maintain a course file that includes:
– Lesson Plan
– COs with Bloom’s level tagging
– CO–PO mapping
– Internal question paper with CO tag
– Sample evaluated answer sheets– Assignment plan
– Attainment calculations– Improvement actions taken
c. CO–PO Attainment Calculation Sheet (Automated if Possible)
A centralized Excel where:
– COs are entered
– Assessment data is input
– Attainment is calculated using preset logic
– Graphs and attainment charts are generated automatically
This helps during Academic Audit, IQAC review, and NBA visits.
d. Faculty Training Calendar
One FDP per year is not enough.
Your academic plan should include:
– Internal training every semester on OBE practices
– Hands-on sessions on CO framing and mapping
– Peer-review exercises
– Cross-department case discussions
Bonus Tip: Have OBE Champions in each department—mentors who guide and review files regularly.
e. SAR Documentation Tracker
You need a tool to track what evidence is ready—and what’s not.
A simple dashboard should cover:
– Course file readiness
– Attainment calculation status
– PO–PSO–PEO alignment
– Feedback collected and analysed
– Improvements implemented
This tracker avoids last-minute panic and builds a culture of preparation.
f. Internal Review Rubric
Create a checklist based on each SAR criterion and sub-criterion.
Before the NBA visit, conduct a dry run with this rubric.
Let every department do a mock audit using these checklists.
Faculty don’t resist NBA because it’s tough.
They resist it because it’s confusing.
But when you give them tools, templates, and clarity—they engage.
They take ownership.
They start building—not just complying.
8. Recommended Free & Open Source Tools
You don’t need a paid ERP to implement OBE effectively.
There are plenty of powerful, free, or open-source tools you can start with right now:
✅ For CO–PO Attainment Calculations
MS Excel / Google Sheets: Most flexible. Automate with formulas and conditional formatting.
LibreOffice Calc: Great offline alternative for institutions using open-source stack.
✅ For Course File Management
Notion: A great tool for collaborative course file creation, lesson plans, and templates.
Google Drive + Docs: Simplify file sharing and version control across departments.
✅ For Internal Rubric-based Reviews
Google Forms: Create department-wise self-evaluation checklists.
JotForm or Typeform (Free plans): More interactive internal SAR tracking and data collection.
✅ For Institutional OBE Handbook & Document Tracker
Trello or ClickUp (Free plans): Build OBE workflow pipelines with clear ownership.
Airtable (Free tier): Create centralized documentation databases with status tracking.
Need Actual Course File Templates with Simulated Subject Data?
I’ve created real Course File Templates filled with simulated academic data that reflect NBA's expectations under Revised SAR 2025.
If your campus wants access, simply drop a request email to: mail@deepeshdivakaran.comSubject: “Request for Course File Template – OBE SAR 2025”
I'll be happy to send you a sample that your department can adapt immediately.
9. If OBE Is Done Right, NBA Is Just a Reflection
Let’s be honest.
Most campuses don’t fear NBA.
They fear the mirror it holds up.
A mirror that doesn’t ask for decorations—but demands to see the real face of your academics.
Outcome-Based Education isn’t a shortcut to accreditation.
It’s a long game of transformation.
When you do it right—students start thinking deeper, faculty teach with more clarity, and your SAR becomes just a snapshot of the system you already live.
Revised NBA SAR 2025 has made one thing very clear: This is no longer a game of forms and folders. This is a test of purpose. Of process. Of how deeply your institution believes in its own outcomes.
So, what’s next?
If you’ve been following this guide, you already know that “Outcome-Based Education – A Practical Guide for Higher Education Teachers” was never written just for accreditation.
It was written for educators who want to rebuild education, from the classroom outward.
If your faculty reads it, uses it, and reflects on it—your next SAR will not be a struggle.
It will be a story of what you’ve already achieved.
Coming Next:
In Part 6, we’ll move beyond classrooms and explore how Industry Engagement and Faculty Development can directly uplift your NBA score—and your institutional culture.
But for now—start with OBE. Do it right. And everything else will follow.
Back to The Definitive 9-Part Series on Revised NBA SAR 2025 for Tier-I Engineering Colleges – Click here to access the full guide and explore all sections.
Thanks for diving into this article! If it sparked some ideas or gave you value, why not take the next step?
Know More about me: Click here
Know more about my work: Click here
Subscribe to my website for more thought-provoking content and resources: www.deepeshdivakaran.com/subscribe
Buy my highly acclaimed book on Outcome Based Education, now used by 1000+ Institutes: Buy It Here at Special Author Price
Follow my NEP 2020 newsletter for exclusive insights into education reform: Subscribe Here
Download my free NEP 2020 Guides for in-depth insights into education policy: Download Now
Want to have a conversation or ask a question? You can call me or WhatsApp me directly at +91 8086015111.
Prefer email? Drop me a line at mail@deepeshdivakaran.com.
Your thoughts and feedback are always appreciated. Let's shape the future of education together!
Stay Inspired, Stay In
Comments