Part 4: Transitioning from NBA SAR 2015 to NBA SAR 2025 – Step-by-Step Blueprint for Tier 2 Colleges
- Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran
- 12 minutes ago
- 13 min read
Content
1. The Revised NBA SAR 2025 isn’t just an update
It’s a complete mindset reset for engineering education in India.
Especially for Tier 2 Colleges, this transition demands more than cosmetic compliance.
It demands systems — real, working systems — that reflect academic integrity, not just paperwork.
If you're still thinking you can survive SAR 2025 by "preparing files two months before the visit," you're setting yourself up for failure.
Before we move ahead, if you haven't already gone through the first three parts of this series, stop here and read them first:
These parts have already covered:
Why NBA revised the SAR at this point
What structural and attitudinal shifts are expected
How graduate attributes (GAPC 4.0) redefine engineering education
Now, in this Part 4, we go deeper.
This article gives you a step-by-step, ground-level blueprint for:
How to actually transition your systems from SAR 2015 to SAR 2025
How to train your faculty and departments
How to redesign your documentation flow
And how to build a campus culture that will survive any accreditation visit, not just NBA.
This isn't theory.
It’s a field-tested execution plan — built for real colleges, with real faculty, facing real constraints.
Because the truth is simple:
You don’t win accreditation with folders. You win it with culture.
Let’s get started.
2. Understanding the Real Differences Between NBA SAR 2015 and NBA SAR 2025 (Tier 2)
At first glance, the Revised NBA SAR 2025 may look like a simple reshuffling of criteria and marks.
But anyone serious about academic quality will see immediately.
The shift is not cosmetic. It’s cultural.
Here’s what truly changed —and why colleges who don’t adapt their thinking (not just their files) will struggle:
Aspect | SAR 2015 | SAR 2025 |
Focus | Document Compliance | Outcome Measurement and Continuous Improvement |
CO-PO Mapping | Done once, often forgotten | Monitored continuously with WK alignment |
Project Work (Capstone) | Optional add-on | Mandatory Capstone Culture (Quality focus) |
Pre-Qualifiers | Relaxed and Flexible | Strict, Non-Negotiable (e.g., SFR, PhD %) |
Faculty Role | Passive — file providers | Active — curriculum designers and assessors |
Student Role | Limited to record-keeping participation | Direct participants in demonstrating outcomes and ethics |
Sustainability, SDGs | Optional (nice to have) | Mandatory (must show curriculum integration) |
Peer Interaction | Documentation-focused | System and Mindset-focused (faculty and student readiness) |
Key Mindset Shifts Colleges Must Make
From record-keeping to real-time academic monitoring
From faculty attendance to faculty impact
From project formalities to problem-solving capabilities
From internal circulars to documented evidence of actions and reflections
From quantity of evidence to quality of learning experiences
Critical Mistake to Avoid
Don’t think you can simply “update the SAR form” and continue old practices behind the scenes.
In Revised NBA SAR 2025, the peer team will speak to your faculty.
They will engage your students.
They will ask deeper questions about why and how your curriculum works.
If your systems, people, and culture aren’t ready —no documentation in the world will save you.
Now that we understand the depth of change needed,
let’s move to the next real action colleges must take.
3. Step 1: Internal Awareness and Gap Audit (Mandatory Before Anything Else)
Transitioning to Revised NBA SAR 2025 isn’t about jumping into file preparation.
The real first step is simpler —but far more critical.
You need to wake up the campus.
Because if your HoDs, your NBA coordinator, and your faculty still think SAR 2025 is "just more paperwork," you've already lost in long term.
What Internal Awareness Means
Conduct formal internal orientation sessions on Revised NBA SAR 2025.
Share practical comparisons: what worked in SAR 2015 vs. what won’t work now.
Train faculty on WK Profiles, revised PO expectations, and outcome evidence collection.
Share the 4-Part and Bonus PO Transition Guide if needed — real awareness, not slogans.
When everyone speaks the same language,
The transition happens faster, smoother, and more honestly.
How to Do a Gap Audit (Simple But Powerful)
After the awareness program, immediately conduct a Gap Analysis Audit.
Form a small Core Audit Team — preferably young, committed faculty across departments.
For each SAR Criteria (Curriculum, Teaching-Learning, Assessment, Faculty, Infrastructure, Continuous Improvement):
Identify what you already have that fits SAR 2025.
Identify what is missing or outdated.
Identify what needs cultural fixing (not just documentation).
Create a Gap Analysis Report:
Criterion-wise Gaps
Risk Level (Critical / Moderate / Cosmetic)
Suggested Corrective Action
Responsible Person(s)
Timeline to Fix
Important Mindset Shift
You are not auditing to blame people.
You are auditing to wake up systems before NBA does it for you.
In Revised SAR 2025, internal honesty is your first line of defence.
📩 Need Help?
If you need a ready-made Gap Analysis Checklist to make this process easier,
please send me an email at mail@deepeshdivakaran.com —
I’ll be happy to share a practical checklist that you can directly use.
Once your Awareness and Gap Audit is done —then and only then should you move into curriculum restructuring.
4. Step 2: Restructure the Curriculum Delivery and CO–PO Alignment
Once your awareness is built and your gaps are identified,
you cannot move forward by patching old practices.
You need to restructure the engine, not repaint the car.
The most critical operational shift under Revised NBA SAR 2025 for Tier 2 colleges is: Curriculum Delivery and CO–PO Mapping must reflect real outcomes, not academic rituals.
What Curriculum Restructuring Really Means
Every subject must clearly define COs (Course Outcomes) aligned with:
Relevant POs
(If possible) Knowledge and Attitude Profiles (WKs) even in Tier 2 to build future readiness.
The Lesson Plan must explicitly show:
Which CO is being targeted in each unit/topic
How the CO is assessed — through assignments, quizzes, projects, labs
Assessment tools must change from "marks for attendance" to "evidence for outcomes".
Mini/Micro Projects, Case Studies, Internships, Capstone Projects must be systematically inserted into curriculum design — not left as voluntary activities.
What You Must Do Right Now
Redefine all COs for active courses:
Make them measurable
Bloom’s Taxonomy based (Apply, Analyze, Evaluate levels)
Map COs to POs based on Revised PO structure:
Use direct, logical linkage (not every CO mapping to every PO blindly).
Update Course Files:
New format: Course Objectives → Course Outcomes → CO-PO Mapping → Delivery Plan → Assessment Strategy.
Faculty Training:
Train every faculty member to explain how their subject maps to institutional POs and how attainment is measured.
Focus on WK understanding even for Tier 2 colleges (ahead of the curve).
Important Reminder
You do not need to reframe COs for old batches retroactively.
But starting CAY 2024–25 onward, your syllabus, delivery plans, and assessments must reflect the new SAR 2025 spirit.
Curriculum delivery is no longer judged on volume of lectures. It’s judged on the achievement of outcomes.
5. Step 3: Department-Wise Documentation Calendar (Instead of Last-Minute Panic)
One of the biggest reasons colleges panic during SAR preparation is simple:
They treat documentation like an event, not a process.
Files are created two months before the peer visit.
Data is collected hastily.
Course files are "rearranged" overnight.
That era is over.
In Revised NBA SAR 2025, if your documentation isn’t built live, semester-by-semester, you won’t survive even the first round of peer team interactions.
What a Department-Wise Documentation Calendar Must Include
Every department must maintain a simple but strict calendar:
Month | Activity | Evidence to Collect |
June–July | CO Definition and Delivery Planning | CO-PO Mapping Sheets, Lesson Plans |
August | Assessment Plan Setup | Internal Assessment Design, Rubrics |
September | Mid-Sem CO Attainment Check | Internal Marks CO-Wise, Assignments Collected |
October | Pre-Semester End Review | Capstone Topics Allocation, Mini-Projects |
November | Final Internal Assessment | CO Attainment Analysis Sheets |
December | Course End Survey and Reflection | Faculty Reflection Report, Student Feedback |
January | Project Work (Industry, SDG-Aligned) Progress | Industry MoUs, Project Logbooks |
February | Placement & Internship Evidence Collection | Internship Completion Certificates |
March | Annual Academic Audit Preparation | Updated Course Files, Program Attainment Sheet |
April–May | Curriculum Revision Meetings (If needed) | BoS Minutes, Revised Syllabus, WK Alignment Tables |
How to Implement It
Assign one documentation in-charge per department (preferably someone energetic and digitally savvy).
Train faculty to update files monthly instead of batch updating later.
Conduct internal audits twice a year — independent, honest, and corrective, not cosmetic.
Important Mindset Shift
Documentation isn't created for NBA anymore.
It’s created because your students deserve academic accountability.
If you build your system semester by semester, NBA accreditation becomes a by-product, not a struggle.
6. Step 4: Pre-Qualifiers Must Be Simulated Internally Before Applying
In the Revised NBA SAR 2025,Pre-Qualifiers are not a formality anymore.
They are hard, non-negotiable entry gates.
If you don't meet even one, your application can get rejected without even being evaluated further.
That's why internal simulation of pre-qualifiers before applying is now mandatory if you are serious about accreditation.
To know more on the Pre Qualifier Refer Part 1 of this Series.
7. Step 5: Faculty and Student Training for SAR 2025 Peer Interaction
Most institutes focus only on files.
But what will actually make or break your NBA visit in SAR 2025 is how your people speak, behave, and explain systems.
Peer Team Members are no longer fooled by printed folders.
They talk directly to your faculty and students.
And if your people are clueless, your entire SAR collapses — no matter how good the paperwork looks.
Training your faculty and students is non-negotiable now.
What Faculty Must Be Trained On
How CO–PO Mapping works — with real examples from their subjects.
How PO attainment is calculated and how it improves over semesters.
How their lab experiments, project guidance, and assessments are now linked to WKs and SDGs (even lightly for Tier 2).
How they have redesigned assignments, lab manuals, and mini-projects for outcomes.
Faculty must be confident, not just compliant.
What Students Must Be Trained On
What are POs and why they matter in real life.
How their projects, internships, and final-year capstones contribute to PO attainment.
How sustainable practices, ethics, teamwork, and communication skills are part of their learning outcomes.
Basic awareness of SAR 2025 expectations (in their language).
Students don’t need to know SAR clauses.
They just need to honestly talk about how the curriculum impacted their learning.
How to Conduct Training
Run mock peer team interviews for faculty and students.
Create FAQ lists — simple, outcome-focused.
Arrange department-wise small workshops where teachers explain PO Mapping using actual subject examples.
Simulate panel interactions: Faculty → Department Coordinator → Students.
Important
Training isn't about giving speeches.
It’s about building confidence, clarity, and honest articulation.
If your faculty and students speak from experience — not memory —Your SAR is already 70% stronger before the peer team even opens your files.
8. Step 6: Mock SAR and Internal Audit Dry Runs (Non-Negotiable Now)
If you are serious about getting accredited under Revised NBA SAR 2025,
then you must treat Mock SAR Submission and Internal Audit like your real accreditation attempt.
Because no matter how good your preparation looks on paper —you don't know where you stand until you simulate it brutally.
Why Mock SAR Is Critical
It tests your documentation under real conditions.
It exposes gaps your core committee missed.
It prepares your faculty and coordinators for real peer team questions.
It forces departments to organize evidence systematically, not casually.
How to Conduct a Proper Mock SAR
Prepare a Complete Draft SAR
Criteria-wise write-ups, course files, attainment data, Pre-Qualifier data — everything.
Appoint an Independent Internal Audit Team
Preferably senior faculty NOT involved in SAR writing.
Simulate a Peer Visit
Create a day-wise schedule.
Conduct department presentations.
Conduct student and faculty interviews.
Evaluate Each Criterion Strictly
Use actual NBA grading logic: Y, C, W, D
Mark non-compliances openly.
Issue a Mock SAR Evaluation Report
With clear Action Points, Critical Gaps, and Immediate Corrections needed.
Important
Don’t just point out mistakes.
Give departments one chance to correct them and re-audit.
Peer Teams under SAR 2025 are coming with sharper lenses. Your internal team must be even sharper before that.
9. Common Pitfalls Colleges Must Avoid During SAR 2025 Transition
Even well-intentioned institutes make critical mistakes when shifting from NBA SAR 2015 to Revised NBA SAR 2025.
Not because they don't care —but because they underestimate how deep the changes really are.
Here’s a straight list of the most dangerous traps you must avoid:
1. Copying Old SAR Templates
SAR 2015 templates are obsolete under SAR 2025.
The way you write about curriculum, teaching-learning, assessment, faculty contributions, and continuous improvement must reflect the new outcome-focused language.
Copy-paste culture will kill your credibility.
2. Hiring Consultants Who Promise Shortcuts
Consultants charging ₹5–10 lakhs promising “ready NBA files” without fixing your systems will do more damage than good.
Peer teams now ask questions beyond documentation — they test real systems, faculty knowledge, student participation.
No document can cover up a hollow system anymore.
3. Ignoring Pre-Qualifiers Until SAR Submission
Many colleges realize SFR, PhD%, or Infrastructure gaps only at submission time — when it's too late.
Pre-qualifier gaps need 6–12 months to fix.
Simulate pre-qualifier checks internally at least a year before planning SAR submission.
4. Treating CO-PO Mapping as Formality
Wrong mapping kills real outcome tracking.
Every CO must be mapped thoughtfully to relevant POs, aligned with curriculum delivery and real assessments.
Mindless mapping (CO linked to all POs) = Straight Weakness (W) or Deficiency (D) in assessment.
5. Ignoring Student Involvement
In SAR 2025, students are stakeholders — not spectators.
If students can't explain their project relevance, internship outcomes, or sustainability awareness, your SAR narrative collapses.
Smart Colleges Build Systems Now, So That NBA Visit Looks Like Just Another Academic Day.
Colleges That Fake It Now Will Pay the Price for the Next 5 Years.
10. Final Words: Transition Is Not an Event. It’s a New Habit.
The biggest mistake colleges make during accreditation preparation?
They treat NBA as a project to be completed once.
They scramble, fix files, run mock drills...
And the moment the peer team leaves, everything collapses back to the old ways.
That mindset won't survive under Revised NBA SAR 2025.
Because SAR 2025 isn’t about preparing for an audit.
It’s about preparing your academic culture to survive and thrive —
every semester, every batch, every faculty member.
Key Truths to Carry Forward
Accreditation today is won on culture, not compliance.
Quality cannot be outsourced to consultants.
Students and faculty must own the outcomes, not just nod during interviews.
Documentation must be alive and real, not hurriedly stitched before a visit.
Leadership must build systems that breathe quality, not decorate it temporarily.
If you build your campus right, NBA Accreditation becomes a natural outcome — not a miracle.
And if you don't?
No consultant, no shortcut, no last-minute rush will save you.
✅ Start now.
✅ Build it step-by-step.
✅ Share this guide with every core committee member, every HoD, and every faculty who matters.
Let's fix the system honestly.
Let’s make accreditation a by-product of excellence, not a race for scores.
How My Book Solves What Revised NBA SAR 2025 Leaves Unsaid
Let’s be honest.
The Revised NBA SAR 2025 brought some good structural changes —
but it also left a lot unsaid.
No practical handbook.
No real-world implementation guide.
No structured support to help colleges actually apply the reforms.
And in that silence, most institutions today are left guessing.
That’s exactly why I wrote my book: "Outcome-Based Education – A Practical Guide for Higher Education Teachers"
Published even before NBA officially launched GAPC 4.0 and the New SAR in 2024.
Built not just from theory, but from on-ground experience of working with over 1000+ campuses across India.
What’s Inside the Book That the SAR Doesn’t Cover
How to Write Real, Measurable PEOs
Most colleges still create vague, theoretical mission statements.
My book gives you format templates backed by Bloom’s levels, stakeholder integration, and clear alignment with vision-mission-goals.
How to Map COs to POs (and Now to WKs)
SAR 2025 expects CO-PO-WK mapping — but doesn't explain how.
I do.
With ready-to-use tables, logical flow, and academic sense — not guesswork.
CO-PO Attainment Calculation (with Interpretation)
Not just formulas.
I explain the logic behind the numbers, how to set target levels, how to report attainment gaps, and how to plan corrective actions.
How to Create Course Files That Actually Prove Outcomes
No more decorative files stuffed with content.
I show how to build course files that speak the language of outcomes — files that actually satisfy NBA assessors.
Faculty-Level Understanding of OBE
One big SAR 2025 risk: If your faculty can’t explain the OBE processes they are following, NBA will mark it as non-compliant.
My book helps faculty internalize OBE — not just "prepare" for the visit.
Many more frameworks, templates, and real case studies
Covering real-world academic situations, innovative assessments, rubrics, student outcome analysis, and how to integrate SDG, PBL, and MOOC-based learning.
Why This Book Matters Now More Than Ever
If you’re preparing for Revised NBA SAR 2025 and you haven't yet adopted this practical framework, you’re doing it the hard way.
You can either keep struggling with interpretations, or you can build clarity, confidence, and compliance — by following a tested system that is already battle-proven in 1000+ campuses.
Grab the book now, and transform your NBA journey from guesswork to mastery.
Outcome-Based Education – A Practical Guide for Higher Education Teachers
(Available on Amazon, Flipkart, and select academic stores)
Get 20% Discount on Author Special Copy: https://www.deepeshdivakaran.com/buybook
Bonus Article: The Most Comprehensive Guide on PO Transition (12 POs to 11 POs)
While working on the SAR 2025 changes, one of the most critical shifts colleges must manage is the transition from 12 Program Outcomes (POs) to 11 POs under the GAPC 4.0 structure.
This transition is not cosmetic — it requires a full realignment of curriculum design, CO-PO mapping, attainment calculations, and reporting.
To address this, I have already published the most comprehensive and practical guide available today on this topic.
In this guide, you will find:
Why the PO structure changed and what it really means,
Step-by-step strategy for updating CO-PO-PSO matrices,
Practical transition mapping tables,
Common mistakes colleges must avoid during PO restructuring.
Access the Complete PO Transition Strategy Guide here: PO Transition from 12 POs to 11 POs – Complete Strategy Article
If your college has not yet restructured your CO-PO mappings to align with the new NBA SAR 2025, this article is absolutely essential reading.
Thanks for diving into this article!
If it sparked something within you, let's keep this momentum going.
Curious about who I am? Get to know me better: Click here
Interested in exploring what I do? Check out my work: Click here
Love thought-provoking content? Subscribe to my website for regular inspiration: www.deepeshdivakaran.com/subscribe
Want deeper insights into Outcome-Based Education? My highly acclaimed book is now used by 1000+ institutes—grab your copy at a special author price: Buy It Here at Special Author Price
Need detailed guidance on education policies? Download my free NEP 2020 Guides Download Now
Connect with me on Linkedin: Click Here
Have questions or want to chat directly? Reach me on call or WhatsApp at +91 8086015111.
Prefer emails? I love them too! Drop a line at mail@deepeshdivakaran.com.
Your thoughts matter. Let’s shape education's future together.
Stay Inspired. Stay Informed.
Comments