Recently, the news highlighted a shocking scandal at Anna University during its latest audit. The report revealed that one person was listed as a faculty member in 32 different posts, and out of 2,500 faculty positions, only 211 were actually filled. This issue of 'phantom' professors is not isolated to one university but is a widespread problem in many institutions under the guise of implementing the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and various reforms.
295 Engineering colleges under Anna University in Tamil Nadu were issued show cause notices, seeking explanation regarding the duplication of faculty members, on Saturday, July 27. Earlier, on July 23, Chennai-based anti-graft NGO Arappor Iyakkam, had released documents that pointed to 224 Engineering colleges under Anna University, having resorted to fraudulent means to acquire affiliation. All those colleges had reportedly presented the same persons as full-time faculty members during inspections in 2023-24.
Why Are These Malpractices Happening?
These problems arise due to the pressure institutions face to meet certain standards like those set by the NIRF (National Institutional Ranking Framework) and accreditation bodies like NAAC and NBA. Institutions often inflate their faculty numbers to improve their rankings or meet accreditation criteria. This is because having a higher number of qualified faculty can make a university look better on paper, attracting more students and funding.
The Underlying Issues
The government needs to address fundamental problems in how colleges are funded and managed. Many educational institutions increase their reported number of faculty to receive more government money or meet specific regulatory standards. This not only misleads but harms the students by diluting the quality of education they receive.
Impact on Students
Here are the consequences students face due to these malpractices:
Skill Deficits: When there are not enough real teachers, students may not get the necessary skills and knowledge they need, leading to large class sizes and less attention to each student.
Quality of Education: With fewer qualified teachers, the education quality drops. Students may not learn what they need to succeed in their future careers.
Reputation: If a school is caught inflating faculty numbers, its reputation can suffer. This makes degrees from such institutions less valuable, affecting graduates' job prospects.
Professional Readiness: Students may graduate unprepared for the workplace, lacking important skills like critical thinking and problem-solving.
Employment Crisis Highlights Systemic Issues
From 2014 to 2022, over 220 million people applied for central government jobs, but only about 722,000 were recommended for appointment. Recent events in Gujarat and Mumbai underscore the severity of the unemployment crisis. Similarly, over 25,000 individuals rushed to a walk-in interview in Mumbai for just 2,216 positions at Air India Airport Services Ltd. These incidents reflect deeper, systemic problems that urgently require government and stakeholder intervention.
Hundreds of young job seekers caused a stampede at a hotel in Ankleshwar, Gujarat, where only ten jobs were available at a Thermax Company plant.
The Solution: One Nation - One Faculty Database
To tackle these issues, a national database for faculty members is proposed. This would include:
Database Development: Creating a secure digital platform to store and manage data on faculty members across India.
Data Collection: Working with universities and colleges to keep the database updated with accurate information on faculty qualifications and experience.
Accessibility: Allowing various stakeholders, including students, to access the database to check faculty credentials.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring all institutions participate and update their information regularly, with penalties for non-compliance.
Benefits of the Database
This database will help increase transparency in higher education by making it easier to monitor and verify faculty qualifications. It will assist in better managing resources, improving teaching standards, and ultimately enhancing the quality of education across the country.
Establishing a unified faculty database is a step towards solving the deeper issues of malpractice in higher education in India. By making the system more transparent and accountable, we can ensure that students receive the quality education they deserve and are well-prepared for their future careers.
Comments